Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:54

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Why did you choose not to join Mensa?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

What’s next?

Obesity Newcomer Metsera, Up 23%, Enters The Ring With A Punch - Investor's Business Daily

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Thank you.

Dying Light: The Beast launches August 22 - Gematsu

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Baseball Gameday: 5/31/25 vs. TCU - Oregon State University Athletics

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Galerie David Guiraud : Deep Space & Celestial Objects - The Eye of Photography

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

I own a small solar company in Montana and might have to lay off most of my employees. I'm not hiding that from them. - Business Insider

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Endometriosis is an interesting disease - Hacker News

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Alan Turing's iconic paper on a 'universal computing machine' goes up for auction - Live Science

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

What do people usually do when they wake up at 5:00 am?